Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 28, 1995No. 07-94-0083-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Presenting six point-of-error contentions, Jack Wirtz seeks the reversal of a take-nothing judgment, rendered on a jury verdict, in his action, predicated on events involving six key man insurance policies issued to him, to recover actual and exemplary damages from Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Jay Eagan, and Robert Dan Thompson, III. On the rationale expressed, the points will be overruled and the judgment will be affirmed.

Wirtz was a former owner and officer of Page & Wirtz Construction Company, a general contractor operating as a Texas corporation and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nairn v. Killeen Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  2. Milam v. National Insurance Crime Bureau, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Carson v. Serrano, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. In Re Goss, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Arthur X. Carson v. A. Serrano and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API