Legal Opinion
Hood v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 13, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-0972 (MB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOUDIN, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on the motion of defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) for summary judgment. Plaintiff William H. Hood filed a three-count amended complaint, seeking recovery of life insurance proceeds from Prudential on contract, misrepresentation and agency theories. Prudential alleges that the policy was voided by false statements and material omissions made on the insurance application by the decedent, Nancy L. Jenson, about the state of her health. For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edgar M. Skinner, Esther Skinner v. Aetna Life and CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Roy Louis Jannenga v. Nationwide Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Hofmann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Jones v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claborn v. Washington National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. NittoloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Claborn v. Washington National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996