Legal Opinion
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance v. Nittolo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 24, 1997No. Civil Action 95-1811 (JBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
Presently before the court are the motions for summary judgment of plaintiff Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and third party defendant Paul Coleman Garber (“Garber”) pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons stated below, both motions will be granted.
I. Background
Defendant John J. Nittolo applied for and was issued a disability income insurance policy from plaintiff Hartford which became effective on December 14, 1992. On July 6, 1994, Nittolo filed for benefits under his policy for the disability of hepatitis. Hartford initiated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LANDIS PIG ROAST, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Z&D REALTY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022