Legal Opinion
Moorehead v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-3595PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Martin L. Moorehead brought this action for damages against General Motors Corporation and against William G. Rohrer, Alan J. Kirsch, and Samuel J. Marino. The complaint states four causes of action, all based on the circumstances surrounding General Motors’ termination of a franchised Chevrolet dealership, Moorehead & Sons Chevrolet, Inc. Plaintiff asserts general federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) (1970), for the first cause of action, and pendent jurisdiction for the remaining three causes of action.
The first cause of action, based on the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schmitt-Norton Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Conroy Datsun Ltd. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U. S. A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Bronx Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Wahsner v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.