Legal Opinion
Roger Allen Marsh v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1976No. 75-2326PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and SNEED, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a federal district judge where the petitioner was a state prisoner.
Issues listed in 110(a), (b), (c), and (d), of the appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (after his state court conviction for rape), each allege a denial of “due process.”
Paragraph 11(a) sets forth, in factual support of 10(a), that the “Allen Charge” was given the jury twice, allegedly in error the second time.
Paragraph 11(b) sets forth, in support of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Odell MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Glenn Dale SeawellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Douglas Earl FosslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Gregorio Jiminez v. E.R. Myers, Warden, Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Jay BeattieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.