Legal Opinion

United States v. Glenn Dale Seawell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1977No. 76-1369PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

The question presented is whether the giving of a second modified Allen charge,1 in response to a jury’s report of deadlock, has such coercive implications that it should, as a sound rule of practice, be prohibited. We conclude that it has.

Seawell was convicted for armed bank robbery and the use of a firearm hi its commission. He was found to be one of three masked robbers and, specifically, the one who guarded the front door of the bank during the robbery. His trial lasted four and one-half days, from Monday to Friday, in the course of which the jury heard the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. CzachorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API