Legal Opinion

Lit v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1937No. 19246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, District Judge.

This is a suit against the United States under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 41 (20), 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20), to recover $67,836.-43 with interest, which the plaintiffs contend represents an overpayment of federal estate tax, to the refund of which they are entitled, and as to which their claim for refund was rejected by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. There is no dispute *436as to the facts, which the court finds to be as follows:

Findings of Fact.

Plaintiffs are the surviving executors of the estate of Samuel D. Lit, who died February 28, 1929.

On January 27, 1923, Samuel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Burnet v. GuggenheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guantanamo Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  2. Herring v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1955
  3. Guantanamo Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API