Higgins v. Hartford County Bar Asso.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
There is only one question at this time we need determine, namely, whether the refusal of the trial court to make a finding of facts for purposes of appeal is justified upon this record. The ground of the court’s decision was the failure of the plaintiff-appellant to state the questions of law arising in the trial which he desired to have reviewed in violar tion of § 18 of the Practice Book, page 311, which reads: “Every draft of a finding presented by counsel must be accompanied by a written request to the judge to make the finding.. The request must contain a statement of the questions of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. KluczinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.