Legal Opinion

Lamb Knitting Machine Co. v. Chicopee Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 18, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

In this case the plaintiff has appealed from an interlocutory decree denying its motion to recommit the master’s report, overruling exceptions thereto, and allowing the defendant’s motion to confirm the report, and from a final decree. The bill was brought to restrain the defendant from preventing, hindering or obstructing *510the plaintiff in using the full quantity of water to which it claims to be entitled during twenty-four hours of each day and from further refusing or neglecting, to provide, maintain and keep open a raceway or aperture under a canal.

The master appointed found that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Dittemore v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Inhabitants of Watertown v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Harvey v. CrookerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Wood v. BaldwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Epstein v. EpsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Chopelas v. ChopelasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Jenney v. HynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Holyoke Water Power Co. v. Whiting & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Regan v. TierneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API