Legal Opinion

Coates v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1887PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The plaintiff, who is a resident freeholder and tax-payer of the village of Sauk Eapids, brought this action in the district court for Bén-ion county, to restrain the defendants, who are the officers of the village of Sauk Eapids, from issuing the bonds provided for in Sp. Laws, 1887, c. 137. A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled •by Collins, J., judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which the de.fendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGilpillaN, C. J.

An act of the legislature approved February 25, 1887, (Sp. Laws, 1887, c. 137,) entitled “An act to authorize the village of Sauk Eapids, in the county of Benton, to issue bonds in aid •of the improvement of the Mississippi river at said Sauk Eapids,” provided : “Section 1. The village council of the village of Sauk Eap-ids, in Benton county, is hereby authorized and empowered to issue the bonds of said village, to the amount not exceeding the sum of forty thousand dollars, for the purpose of aiding in the construction ■of a dam across the Mississippi river at said Sauk Eapids, and for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Wheeler v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. State v. Nelson CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kingman v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API