Legal Opinion

Caillier v. City of Newcastle

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1967No. 3508PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Norman Caillier and Mary Caillier, husband and wife, sued the City of Newcastle, Wyoming, for flood and water damages to their motel property. They alleged the city had negligently obstructed a natural water course, and as a proximate result of such obstruction their damage was caused. Trial was to the court without a jury. The court found for defendant-city and plaintiffs have appealed.

Prior to the flooding here involved, the City of Newcastle had caused a bridge over Cambria Creek, on North Seneca Street, to be replaced by two culverts. Cambria Creek was described by witnesses as an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Savage v. TOWN OF LANDER, WYO.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kalman v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dallason v. BuckmeierWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Preston A. Parkinson v. The California Company, a Corporation, and Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Buckley v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API