Legal Opinion

Preston A. Parkinson v. The California Company, a Corporation, and Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1958No. 5677_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, as owners of a cafe and bar in the town of Jackson, Wyoming, brought this action against defendants as the manufacturers of liquid propane gas, for personal injuries and property damages caused by an explosion. The complaint alleged that the defendants’ 1 failure to properly odorize certain liquid propane gas at the time of sale and delivery to a purchaser, who in turn sold it to plaintiffs, was negligence and the proximate cause of the explosion. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss, and judgment was entered for the defendants. Applying the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. O'Malley v. EaganWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Preston A. Parkinson v. The California Company, a Corporation and Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Skelly Oil Co. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. Hittle Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Blueflame Gas, Inc. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. MacKrell v. Bell H2S SafetyWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Zamora v. Mobil Oil Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API