Henderson v. Hart
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County and from an order denying a new trial. E. A. Bridgford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
1. In its original form, this was an action in the nature of replevin to recover possession of one hundred and forty-six head of swine alleged to be the property of plaintiff and wrongfully taken and withheld by defendant. In his answer defendant justified the taking in his capacity of township constable under a writ of attachment issued in a certain suit against one W. M. Ham; he alleged that the hogs were the property of said Ham, and also that before the commencement of this action he had sold them under execution to satisfy the judgment obtained in said suit against Ham, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Riciotto v. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Richards v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Genger v. AlbersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- More v. BurgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Moskovitz v. LefrancoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.