Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2009No. 138691PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

773 N.W.2d 257 (2009)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Thomas HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138691. COA No. 281375.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 16, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we AFFIRM that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that held that the defendant's constitutional right to self-representation was not violated, but for a reason other than that stated by the Court of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas Hill v. Cindi CurtinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Kennedy v. MackieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Hill v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Garry Jones v. Thomas BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. People of Michigan v. Antoine Lee ScottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API