Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2004No. Docket 122998PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

In this case, we granted leave to appeal to consider whether a defendant may, by conduct alone, “unequivocally” waive his Sixth Amendment Right to counsel and elect to proceed pro se. We need not reach that question in this case because a review of the record reveals that defendant clearly and unequivocally declined self-representation. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged with possession with intent to deliver less than fifty grams of both cocaine and heroin.1 At the beginning of trial, defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. OdomMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. BuieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Thomas Hill v. Cindi CurtinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. People v. KammeraadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API