Legal Opinion

State v. Barela

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 7, 1989No. 880547-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Defendant Eddie Walter Barela appeals from his conviction of incest, a third degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-7-102 (1989). Defendant contends the trial court violated his constitutional right of confrontation by admitting the victim’s preliminary hearing testimony at trial, even though the victim was physically present. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

Defendant was charged with incest for engaging in sexual intercourse with his twenty-one-year-old sister who suffered from severe cerebral palsy.

On January…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Charles R. Burns v. Donald ClusenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. EllisUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. HigginbothamUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. State v. DrawnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. State v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API