United States v. Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This case came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count One for Fail ure to State an Offense and the government’s opposition thereto. Having considered the papers submitted by the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, the Court finds that Count One of the indictment is sufficient to state an offense and therefore denies defendant’s motion.

I. DISCUSSION

Defendant Mark Carter was charged under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). That statute reads in part as follows:(g) It shall be unlawful for any person—(1) who has…