Legal Opinion
Boarman v. County of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 21, 2014No. 2:11-cv-02825 KJM KLNPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On August 22, 2014, the court heard argument on the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants County of Sacramento, City of Rancho Cordova, Officer Sean Barry, and Officer Manuel Kon-stantinidis (collectively defendants), as well as plaintiffs motion to modify the scheduling order. Robert Chalfant appeared for defendants; Manolo Olaso appeared for plaintiff Andrea Boarman. After considering the parties’ arguments, the court DENIES the motion to modify the scheduling order and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion for summary judgment.
I.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- (PC) Miller v. AdonisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Wells v. GonzalesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Cherry v. Serco, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Haytham Elzayn v. Anthony Trad; Christopher Trad; Viscom Industrial Supply LLC; and Labelmax ID LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.