Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Serco, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 10, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00353Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MALCOLM CHERRY, Case No. 2:19-cv-353-HL Plaintiff, ORDER v. SERCO, INC., Defendant. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. On September 13, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and an order denying Plaintiff Malcolm Cherry’s (Cherry) motion to amend the case schedule. In his F&R, Judge Hallman recommended that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In his case scheduling order, Judge Hallman denied Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.