Legal Opinion

Rosemiller v. Zucker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1938No. Appeal, 84Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the evidence requires that plaintiff be held guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff brought an action in trespass against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between an automobile truck owned by defendant and operated by his duly authorized employee, and an automobile truck operated by plaintiff, at the intersection of Delaware Avenue and Summer Street, in the City of Philadelphia. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Dopler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Toyer v. HillemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API