Legal Opinion

People v. Blair

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1932No. Docket No. 2168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

Appellant, together with one Stalker, was charged with the crime of burglary. The information, which was in two counts, charged that appellant and Stalker entered a store upon two separate occasions, and took therefrom certain automobile accessories. Stalker plead guilty to one of the counts in the information, and appellant entered a plea of not guilty to both counts and was placed on trial. A verdict of guilty upon both counts was found by the jury. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and he appeals from the judgment entered against him and from the order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BrittainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. People v. WestwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. VitosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API