Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1906No. Crim. No. 17PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P: Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Information for burglary, alleging also two prior convictions of burglary of the second degree. Defendant was found guilty by the jury and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The transcript contains the following entries:

“October 14th, 1902. Being called upon to plead the defendant pleaded not guilty as charged in the information.

The cause came on for trial October 27,1902, and out of the hearing of the jury panel the district attorney withdrew one of the two charges of prior conviction; The minutes of the court then show:

“Being called…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. BrittainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People v. WheatleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. People v. WestwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. BlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API