Legal Opinion
People v. Vitos
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 3, 1944No. Crim. No. 2282PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant was convicted on a charge of burglary. From the judgment he has appealed. He claims that the evidence was insufficient. A determination of the merits of that claim requires a statement of the evidence.
On the trial the prosecution called two witnesses, Bert Keane, a saleman, and Charles A. Gallivan. The former was at the time of the offense a salesman in the clothing department of the White House, a prominent department store in San Francisco. Mr. Gallivan was at said time an inspector of the San Francisco Police Department assigned to the shopping detail. The prosecution called…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Commonwealth v. MulreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Commonwealth v. CoyneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- People v. WestwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. BlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DeptulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- People v. TimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. HildrethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962