Legal Opinion

Clark v. Sherman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1893No. 668PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

Plaintiff brought ah action for money had and received. The proof introduced showed that the liability of the defendant, if any, did not arise at all on account of any money which had come into his possession under such circumstances as would authorize a recovery therefor, as for money had and received for the use of plaintiff. On the contrary, such proof showed that the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff grew out of an al*682leged contract, by which, in consideration of her agreeing to surrender to him the interest which she had in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Distler v. DabneyWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. McGeerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Osten v. WinehillWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Child Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. PageWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ludwig v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API