Legal Opinion
Ludwig v. Hollingsworth
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1929No. 21754. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, Ludwig, sought recovery in the superior court for Yakima county against the defendant, Hollingsworth, upon a complaint, the whole of the body of which reads as follows:
“For Cause of Action the Plaintiff States:
“ (1) That at sundry times between, on or about the 17th day of May, 1922, and the 17th day of November, 1922, the said defendant received from this plaintiff the sum of $3,100, to the use of the plaintiff.
“ (2) That said defendant refuses to pay said sum, or any part thereof; that said sum is justly due and owing plaintiff from defendant, and wholly unpaid.
“Wherefore…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Breshears v. CallenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Grannis v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Bosworth v. WolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Distler v. DabneyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. Baker Clothing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beadle v. BartaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958