Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Roberts

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1996No. 96-2398PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*60ORDER OF THE COMMISSION OF JUDGES.

This matter came to be reviewed by a commission of five judges appointed by the Supreme Court of Ohio pursuant to Gov.Jud.R. II(5)(E)(1) and R.C. 2701.11.

The commission members are as follows: Judges James A. Brogan, Chair; Cynthia Lazarus, James Sherck, Jon Spahr, and Thomas Swift.

The complaint filed against respondent, Judge Robert C. Roberts, alleged that Judge Roberts in the course of a judicial campaign for the office of judge of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District disseminated campaign material implying that he currently holds the judicial…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KaupOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against BurickOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API