Legal Opinion
In Re 72nd Street Realty Associates
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1995No. 19-10728PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON OBJECTION TO CLAIM FOR SANCTIONS
JAMES L. GARRITY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Pursuant to a cross-motion filed in response to Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky’s (“AKOO”) motion to be relieved as counsel herein, WT Associates (“WT”) seeks to sanction AKOO, Roy Babitt, Esq., (“Babitt”), an AKOO partner, and Lawrence Hartman, Esq., (“Hartman”), a former AKOO partner, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9011, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and our inherent sanction powers. 1 AKOO, Babitt and Hartman (collectively, the “Objeetants”) object to the Claim and pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7012 and Fed.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Spectee Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Goldstein v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1996
- 680 Fifth Avenue Associates v. EGI Co. Services (In Re 680 Fifth Avenue Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In Re TemplehoffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Bfw Liquidation, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.