People v. Augborne
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Defendant, Brit Fanuel Augborne III, appeals from his convictions for second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 1 §211) and criminal threats. (§ 422.) The jury also found a criminal street gang enhancement allegation to be true. (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) Finally, defendant admitted that at the time he committed the robbery he was released from custody on his own recognizance. (§ 12022.1.) Defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support the section 186.22 gang enhancement; the trial court erroneously imposed two section 12022.1 on-bail enhancements; and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Alexander L.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Anthony Garcia v. Tom L. Carey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. LozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Emery v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.