Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Love

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1911No. 2622PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application by the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company for a writ of prohibition against J. E. Love and others, members of the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This is an original action in this court for a writ of prohibition, brought by plaintiff, one of the public service corporations doing business as a common carrier in the state, against the defendants, constituting the membership of the Corporation Commission.

At some time, the date of which is not made to appear, the officers of Lynn Lane township, Tulsa county, filed in the office of the said Commission, a complaint, alleging that plaintiff was operating a line of railroad within the state of Oklahoma which intersected one of the section lines running north and south within the said…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Good v. KeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Monahawee v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Our Lady of the Rockies, Inc. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API