Amerigas Propane, L.P. v. BP America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. ZAGEL, District Judge.
1. BACKGROUND
There is little dispute regarding the facts in this case. As part of its Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the government, 1 Defendants BP America Inc. and BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP Defendants” or “Defendants”) admitted that in February 2004, some of its traders manipulated the February 2004 TET propane market, propane stored in and shipped via the Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC (“TEPPCO”) pipeline system. 2 In order to artificially create a lack of supply and raise TET propane prices, BP…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
- Thompson's Gas & Electric Service, Inc. v. BP America Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Braman v. CME Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Richardson v. City of Chi.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Haney v. Bridge to Life, LTD., a Wyoming CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.