Legal Opinion
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Liu
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 8, 2007No. CV 05 9015 ERPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RAFEEDIE, Senior District Judge.
The Court has received, read, and considered all papers filed in connection with Plaintiff Philip Morris USA Inc.’s motion for summary judgment against Defendant John X. Liu, and it hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs motion in its entirety for the following reasons:
I. Standard of Review
Summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact” and “the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325, 106…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Entrepreneur Media, Inc., a California Corporation v. Scott Smith, an Individual Dba EntrepreneurprCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Yelp Inc. v. CatronDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- UL LLC v. Space Chariot Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Nat'l Prods., Inc. v. Arkon Res., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.