Legal Opinion

Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Lee

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 6, 2008No. 3:05-cv-00490PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT MOTOHIRO MIYAGI

PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Philip Morris USA Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) “Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Motohiro Miyagi,” filed on August 20, 2007, in the above-captioned cause. After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs Motion should be granted for the reasons set forth below.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Plaintiff is a Virginia corporation with its principal place of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. PatelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Clearline Technologies Ltd. v. Cooper B-Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Deniece Design, LLC v. BraunDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  5. Animaccord Ltd. v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule ADistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API