Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 20, 2002No. AC 21738PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Tanaka Davis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jmy trial, *642of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103. The defendant claims that the court improperly admitted into evidence his written, uncorroborated statement containing confessions of uncharged misconduct that resulted in unfair prejudice to him. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant and the victim, Carl Neal, were acquainted with one another; Neal had caused some damage to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BramanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008