Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Sharon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1987No. 85-5293PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Sharon argues that the district court judge’s failure to advise him of a special parole term violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. He also argues that the court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 by not making and attaching findings as to the accuracy of the presentencing materials. We reverse because Rule 11 was violated.
BACKGROUND
The judge asked Sharon if he had been advised of the maximum penalty provided by law for the offenses to which he was pleading guilty. Sharon was advised that he could face up to 21 years imprisonment. No…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nardell U. Carter v. Daniel McCarthy Midge Carroll, John K. Van De KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Thomas TravisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Guy Robin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Edward Bunker v. Jack WiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Mickey Turner, United States of America v. Kenneth Raven Beler, United States of America v. Anthony Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Angel Fernandez-AnguloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Frank R. AlberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William A. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Carlos A. Sanclemente-BejaranoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.