Legal Opinion
United States v. William A. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1993No. 92-16660PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
William Roberts (“Roberts”) appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The primary issue is whether the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 when it failed to advise Roberts of a term of supervised release at his plea hearing. We hold it did and vacate Roberts’s sentence and remand to the district court with instructions.
I
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Roberts owned Gemini Chemical, a chemical supply company, and was involved in buying and selling large quantities of precursor chemicals, as well as manufacturing and distributing the finished…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MARTINEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steaven Martin BASINGER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael Salgado AVILA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.