Legal Opinion

Brinkerhoff v. Aloe

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided December 24, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ill Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

This is a bill to restrain the infringement of letters pat* ent No. 224,991, granted to Alexander W. Brinkerhoff under date of March 2, 1880, for an improvement in “rectal, specula.” The patentee, in his specification, thus describes his invention:

“My speculum is made of metal, and plated in tlie usual manner, to secure a bright interior and smooth surface. In shape it is conical, and has one side slotted through its entire length of chamber. Into such slot is closely fitted a movable slide, having upon its rear end a handle for actuating it. On the side of the tube opposite the slide is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Metropolitan Wringing Mach. Co. v. YoungU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glenn L. Anderson and Hubbs & Howe Company v. Phoenix Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. Autosales Gum & Chocolate Co. v. Caille Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Everlasting Furniture Brace Co. v. WittliffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  4. P. H. Murphy Manuf'g Co. v. Excelsior Car-Roof Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API