Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Meilahn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 5, 1989No. CX-89-20PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court, in denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint against respondent-garnishee insurers allegedly covering the owner, but not the driver, of the car which injured appellant, determined that the agreement approved in Miller v. Shugart, 316 N.W.2d 729 (Minn.1982) is distinguishable from that presented in the instant case. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Debra Nichols was injured when she was trapped under a vehicle owned by Phillip Osmundson while trying to remove the vehicle from a ditch. Drivers of the car during the occurrence included…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Johnson Motor Co., Inc. v. CueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Roinestad v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Chalmers v. KanawyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Vang v. VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992