Chalmers v. Kanawyer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Richard Chalmers was injured in a head-on automobile accident allegedly caused by respondent Robert Kanawyer. Appellant entered into a purported Miller-Shugart agreement with respondent, but the agreement failed to include the owner of the vehicle, who was the named insured under a liability insurance policy covering the car. Based upon his reading of a decision of this court, appellant became convinced that the agreement would not be binding on the insurer in a garnishment action because it was not a valid Miller-Shugart agreement. Appellant therefore moved the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re BuckmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Medmarc Casualty Insurance v. Angeion Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.