Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Kanawyer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1996No. CX-95-1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Richard Chalmers was injured in a head-on automobile accident allegedly caused by respondent Robert Kanawyer. Appellant entered into a purported Miller-Shugart agreement with respondent, but the agreement failed to include the owner of the vehicle, who was the named insured under a liability insurance policy covering the car. Based upon his reading of a decision of this court, appellant became convinced that the agreement would not be binding on the insurer in a garnishment action because it was not a valid Miller-Shugart agreement. Appellant therefore moved the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re BuckmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Medmarc Casualty Insurance v. Angeion Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API