Legal Opinion

Roinestad v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1957No. 37,000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a default judgment against the garnishee in this action and permitting it to make a disclosure. The facts are not in dispute.

Defendant is now a resident of Florida. He formerly lived in Minnesota and was engaged in an insurance business. Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendant alleging that on or about March 28, 1954, plaintiffs purchased a 1950 Plymouth automobile and that defendant agreed to issue to them a comprehensive collision insurance policy covering this automobile. They further alleged that they paid defendant $150…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Munzer v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Ohnstad v. Henry Meyers. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Coller v. Guardian Angels Roman Catholic Church of ChaskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API