St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Tarrant. Tried'below before Hon. Irby Dunklin.
1Opinion of the Court
In the fifth paragraph of the charge of the court, referred to in the opinion, the jury were instructed that: “If you do not believe from the evidence that defendant was guilty of negligence, as negligence is defined above, in the manner of making up its train in Texarkana, then you will find for the defendant.”
CONNER, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted by appellee to recover damages on account of injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted upon his wife, Mattie Lee Ferguson. It was alleged that on the 28th day of April, 1899, appellee and his wife were passengers upon a passenger…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. RushingTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Sawyer v. DulanyTexas Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jordan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RedekerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- P. N.T. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Camp Mfg. Co. v. BeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.