Legal Opinion
PAK Realty Associates v. RE/MAX Universal, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 5, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph F. Lisa, J.
This matter arises out of a commercial nonpayment action. *986Petitioner moved to strike the respondent’s affirmative defenses of improper service of the petition and notice of petition, no proper rent demand, and oral lease modification and waiver, and respondent’s counterclaim.
The matter was set down for a traverse hearing and final determination of the motion on April 13, 1993. On that date a traverse hearing was held and written and oral argument was submitted on the issues of improper service presented in petitioner’s motion.
At the traverse hearing the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- 950 Third Ave Co. v. Eastland Industries, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- JDM Washington Street, LLC v. 90 Washington Rest. Associates, LLCCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012
- People v. Herne, New York County Courts2013
- South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2024
- South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County2024
- Bogatz v. Extra Touch International, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999