Legal Opinion

Armour Car Lines v. Summerour

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1909No. 1256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Intervention, from city court of Dalton — Judge Longley. May 21, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Upon the trial of an action for damages between W. F. Summerour and the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company, the Armour Car Lines, a corporation of New Jersey, presented a petition asking that it permitted to intervene as a party defendant, upon the ground that it was “vitally interested in said case,” and that, under certain circumstances, in the event of a recovery by the plaintiff therein against the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company, it would become liable to pay said railroad company the .amount of the recovery, or some part thereof. Dpon objection by the plaintiff, the judge, in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benson v. ShinesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Haskins v. Bank of the StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Turnbull v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. WardeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Masters v. PardueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Clark v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Carswell v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API