Legal Opinion
Keepseagle v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 99-3119 (EGS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Class Counsel to modify the Settlement Agreement that was entered in this case in 2011. The Settlement Agreement created a $680,000,000 fund and included precise terms regarding the distribution of that fund to individual class members who could prove their claims in a non-Judicial Claims Process. In 2013, after the entire distribution process had been completed, Class Counsel notified the Court that approximately $380,000,000 remained in the fund. The Settlement Agreement mandates…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- In Re Baby Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Theodore Frank v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dunn v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Duran v. GrishamDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Friske v. Bonnier CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.