Legal Opinion

Theodore Frank v. Target Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 26, 2018No. 17-2275PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wood, Chief Judge.

Inequitable settlements are an unfortunate recurring bug in our system of class litigation. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) is designed to minimize such problems, but appeals by class members who object to a settlement indicate that the system still needs improvement. All too often, class counsel negotiate a settlement with substantial attorneys' fees but meager benefits for the class. See, e.g. , Redman v. RadioShack Corp. , 768 F.3d 622 , 638-39 (7th Cir. 2014). Named plaintiffs fail to live up to their ethical obligations as fiduciaries to the class. See, e.g. ,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. In Re Baby Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Quawntay Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Theodore Frank v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Raymond HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. In re Petrobras Sec. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. BLEDSOE v. LAWRENCEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API