Theodore Frank v. Target Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, Chief Judge.
Inequitable settlements are an unfortunate recurring bug in our system of class litigation. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) is designed to minimize such problems, but appeals by class members who object to a settlement indicate that the system still needs improvement. All too often, class counsel negotiate a settlement with substantial attorneys' fees but meager benefits for the class. See, e.g. , Redman v. RadioShack Corp. , 768 F.3d 622 , 638-39 (7th Cir. 2014). Named plaintiffs fail to live up to their ethical obligations as fiduciaries to the class. See, e.g. ,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In Re Baby Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Quawntay Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Theodore Frank v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Raymond HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- In re Petrobras Sec. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- BLEDSOE v. LAWRENCEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.