Legal Opinion

Cinel v. Connick

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 6, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court are the parties’ many contentions, given on the Court’s request, to show cause: (1) why the Court’s March 26, 1991 Order temporarily prohibiting anyone from destroying, transferring or disposing of originals or copies of certain materials seized from plaintiff’s residence should not be made permanent, 1 and (2) why the parties and all others with actual notice of this order should not be required to submit to the Court, in camera, an inventory of any of these materials they possess.

For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. On Command Video Corp. v. LodgeNet Entertainment Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
  2. Rubin v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  3. The New York Times Co. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. In Re FraserDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
  5. Castano v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API