Legal Opinion

Surapaneni v. Surapaneni

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2001No. 01-1600, 01-1689PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants petition this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court judge to recuse himself from further proceedings in this matter. (No. 01-1600). On the same day that the petition was filed in this court, the district court issued an order denying a motion for such recusal. The defendants also appeal that order. (No. 01-1689). Pursuant to the defendants’ motion, the petition for relief in mandamus and the appeal are hereby consolidated for consideration upon the briefs filed in support of the petition for a writ of mandamus.

The defendants, Quality Information Services,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Samuel E. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Kendrix M. Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents Terry Sandalow, Individually and as Dean of Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. CravenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Norman C. HartselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ricky LanierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Elledge v. MeredithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Miles v. Detroit, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API