Legal Opinion
United States v. Norman C. Hartsel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1999No. 98-3639PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKINLEY, District Judge.
The Defendant, Norman Hartsel, was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio of mail fraud, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, and aiding and abetting the embezzlement of funds of a labor organization, 29 U.S.C. § 501(c). On appeal, Hartsel asserts that the district court erred in finding the receipt of mailed bank statements constituted a use of the mails under the mail fraud statute, and in concluding the embezzled funds were the funds of a labor organization. Hartsel also contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Baron T. Youn Kyong Hwan Choi, D/B/A Ckh Sportsworld, Ltd. v. Track, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. William StiversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Scott v. Metropolitan Health Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Charles Chathas v. Local 134 Ibew, Unified Social Club, and Mike FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.