Legal Opinion

Scott v. Simons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 28, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Osceola District Court.— W. D. Boies, Judge. Action to recover a balance alleged to be due plaintiff on the exchange of land. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, O. J.

1. Fraud : liability for fraud: knowledge of fraud : consummation of contract: . effect. I. Plaintiff brings this action in equity to recover a balance unpaid upon a written contract for the sale of certain land in Osceola County, and to impress upon and enforce against the land a vendor’s lien for the unpaid balance. The facts out of which the controversy arises are substantially as follows:

The defendant was the owner of all of Section 14 in Township 1, Range 21 East, in the county of Stanley, state of South Dakota. In the month of June, 1914, he placed this land in the hands of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Hartford Life Ins. v. HanlonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Vernol v. . VernolNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ankeney v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Deer Park Baking Co. v. Cleveland & Chicago Motor Express Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API