Legal Opinion

Danzy v. Iatse Local 22

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 23, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-2083Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DAREN DANZY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-02083 (RCL/RMM) ) IATSE Local 22, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff, Daren Danzy (“Mr. Danzy”), has sued Defendants IATSE1 Local 22 (“Local 22”) and three Local 22 officers and employees (collectively referred to as “Individual Defendants”), John Brasseaux (“Mr. Brasseaux”), Cathy Sonneborn2 (“Ms. Sonneborn”), and I. Chuck Clay (“Mr. Clay”) for racial discrimination.3 Although discovery closed on January 25, 2020, four discovery motions remain…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burt Beavers v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General CounselCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. Watts v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API