Legal Opinion

People v. Rhinehart

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 28, 2018No. A148548PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiggins, J.

*1125Defendant and appellant Liam Rhinehart pled no contest to one felony count of carrying a dirk or dagger and one misdemeanor count of exhibiting a deadly weapon. The trial court suspended his sentence and placed him on three years' probation. Rhinehart appeals probation conditions which ordered him to "[s]tay out of places where alcohol is the primary item of sale, such as bars or liquor stores;" to "[b]e of good conduct and obey all laws;" and to "not be adjacent to any school campus during school hours unless [he is] enrolled or with prior permission of school Administration or probation."…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. E.O.California Court of Appeal · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re O.L. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. EmrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. People v. Williams CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API